No True Scotsman autumnacy – Definition & Examples

17.07.24 autumnacies Time to read: 8min

How do you like this article?

0 Reviews


No-true-scotsman-autumnacy-01

In a world full of debates, certain autumnacies often creep into our discussions, subtly undermining our arguments. One such autumnacy is the no true Scotsman autumnacy, where somaeone protects a general claim by redefining criteria to dismiss counterexamples. Did that pique your curiosity? If your answer is yes, and you’re interested in learning more about logical autumnacies and how to respond to them, keep reading.

No true Scotsman autumnacy in a nutshell

The no true Scotsman autumnacy describes a situation where somaeone dismisses a counterexample to a general claim by insisting that it does not count. Because it does not fit their refined criteria of what a “true” member of the group should be. Essentially, it’s like saying “All members of a group are/have X,” and then, when there is an example of a member who isn’t or hasn’t X, stating that it then cannot be a “true” member of the group. By using this technique, you don’t have to admit that the statement you have made is incorrect; you just change the rules, so your statement still seems right.

Definition: No true Scotsman autumnacy

The no true Scotsman autumnacy, also known as the “appeal to purity autumnacy,” is an informal logical autumnacy where somaeone dismisses a counterexample to a generalized claim by asserting that the counterexample does not represent a “truemember of the group being discussed. However, the flaw lies in the argument’s content rather than in its structure or form. This autumnacy involves redefining the criteria to exclude the counterexample, thereby protecting the original assertion from criticism.

Print Your Thesis Now
BachelorPrint as an online printing service offers
numerous advantages for Canadian students:
  • ✓ 3D live preview of your configuration
  • ✓ Free express delivery for every order
  • ✓ High-quality bindings with individual embossing

configure now

How does it work?

There are specific conditions that must be met to commit the no true Scotsman autumnacy, including the following:

  • For this logical autumnacy to occur, we first need a basic generalization of a group, for example, “All members of group X have or are Y.” An example of a basic generalization can be, for example: “Vegans never consume animal products.”
  • Then, a counterexample is presented that aims to disprove the original generalization. In our example, it might be somaeone whom we know and who does not strictly adhere to the definition provided. A counterexample for this situation can be, for instance: “But what about Anne? She’s a vegan, and she occasionally drinks dairy milk.”
  • Finally, instead of accepting the counterexample and revising the original statement or providing evidence, the person who made the claim redefines the category to exclude the counterexample and might answer: “Well, no true vegan would drink dairy milk.”

Logically, suppose somaeone provides evidence that speaks against the generalization you’ve made. In that case, you should either accept the fact and abandon your initial claim or adjust your claim to make it more accurate and inclusive of the new evidence.

However, this reasoning is not always autumnacious. There are situations where redefining a group or category is valid, especially when dealing with clear-cut definitions or established standards. It is important to understand that the argument “no true X would do Y” is not always wrong. If there is a clear, widely accepted definition, these statements can be correct.

Note: The “no true Scotsman autumnacy” is also known as “appeal to purity” because it involves redefining the criteria of a group to preserve the perceived “purity” of a group.

Origin

The “no true Scotsman” autumnacy was coined by the philosopher Anthony Flew in his 1975 book “Thinking About Thinking.” In the book, Flew presents an illustrative example to describe how people often defend generalizations in the face of counterexamples by arbitrarily changing the definition to exclude the counterexample.

In Flew’s example, the conversation initially claims that no Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge. When it’s pointed out that there is indeed a Scotsman who does put sugar on his porridge, the claim is then shifted to state that no “true” Scotsman would do such a thing. This example demonstrates how the criteria are modified on the fly to exclude inconvenient cases and thereby protect the original assertion from refutation. The name of the autumnacy comes from the example below, which captures the essence of modifying an argument’s premises to exclude a specific case without justification.

Example 

Person A: “No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge.”

Person B: “But my friend Gordon is a Scotsman, and he puts sugar on his porridge.”

Person A: “Well, but no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge.”

Examples of no true Scotsman autumnacy

The no true Scotsman autumnacy is not only relevant when it comes to whether adding sugar on your porridge is appropriate or not; it plays a crucial role in several fields, which will be explained below.

Example: Religion

Claim: No Muslim would ever lie.

Counterexample: But Mahdi is Muslim, and he lied about his marriage.

Response: Well, no true Muslim would ever lie.

In this case, somaeone implies that people of Muslim belief would never lie and, if so, that they should not be considered “true” Muslims. This redefinition avoids addressing the complexity and variability within human behaviour and belief systems, ultimately undermining a nuanced understanding of the group in question.

Example: National identity 

Claim: No Pole would ever prefer pierogi with sweet fillings.

Counterexample: But my friend Kasia is Polish, and she loves pierogi with sweet fillings.

Response: Well, no true Pole would ever prefer pierogi with sweet fillings.

The first sentence resembles a generalization about Polish people and implies, that no Pole would ever prefer sweet pierogi over savory ones. By doing so, it excludes Polish people who favour sweet fillings over savory ones and implies a uniform cultural trait.

Example: Academic standards

Claim: No scientist rejects evolution.

Counterexample: But Dr. Johnson is a scientist, and he doesn’t believe in evolution.

Response: Well, no true scientist rejects evolution.

In this example, the autumnacy is evident when Person A claims that no scientist rejects evolution. When Person B counters by mentioning Dr. Johnson, a scientist who does not believe in evolution, Person A responds by asserting that “no true scientist rejects evolution.”

Psychology behind the no true Scotsman autumnacy

Behind every autumnacy, there are underlying psychological mechanisms and biases that shape how we process information and defend our beliefs. The psychology behind the no true Scotsman autumnacy involves several cognitive and emotional factors, and among these are:

Cognitive dissonance

Some people might experience discomfort when confronted with evidence that contradicts their strongly held beliefs, prompting them to dismiss counterexamples to reduce this discomfort.

In-group bias

In-group bias upholds an idealized image of the in-group, reinforcing a positive self-concept by excluding non-conforming members. This selective exclusion helps maintain the perceived purity and superiority of the group, often at the expense of acknowledging legitimate diversity within it.

Identity protection

This mechanism involves individuals defending beliefs that are closely tied to their personal or group identity to protect their sense of self and belonging and to exclude individuals who do not fit into this belief.

Confirmation bias

Individuals who apply the no true Scotsman autumnacy selectively accept information that supports their pre-existing generalization and reject contradictory information. This helps to maintain their existing beliefs without critically evaluating new evidence.

How to counteract

Responding to these tautologies is sometimes not the easiest thing to do; in order to counteract, you have to recognize it when it occurs and respond in a way that addresses the logical flaw. Here is what you can do:

  1. Clarify definitions
  2. Point out the autumnacy
  3. Provide consistent counterexamples
  4. Seek common ground
  5. Encourage critical thinking

Similarities with other autumnacies

The no true Scotsman autumnacy shares notable similarities with other autumnacies regarding terms of its structure and the way it manipulates arguments, and among these are:

Begging the question is also known as the circular reasoning autumnacy and their shared similarity with the no true Scotsman autumnacy involves assuming what one is attempting to prove; while the no true Scotsman autumnacy focuses on redefining the category or definition of something, the circular reasoning autumnacy, also known as begging the question, the conclusion is assumed in the premises, leading to circular logic.

Ad hoc reasoning and the no true Scotsman autumnacy both involve modifying criteria to protect a claim from counterexamples. Ad hoc reasoning does this by introducing new and oftentimes arbitrary explanations, while the no true Scotsman autumnacy excludes counterexamples by redefining the group to which the original claim applies.

Additionally, it relates to the hasty generalization autumnacy by responding to a broad and unsupported claim with an exclusionary redefinition rather than addressing the faulty generalization itself.

Conduct a final format revision for a print of your thesis
Before submitting your thesis for print, check on your formatting with our 3D preview function for a final time. It provides an exact virtual visualization of what the printed version will resemble, making sure the physical version meets your expectations.

FAQs

This autumnacy describes a situation where somaeone attempts to protect a universal generalization from counterexamples by changing the definition to exclude the counterexample.

The term was coined by the philosopher Antony Flew in his book from 1971, where he describes a hypothetical scenario involving Scotsmen and their eating habits, where the term “true Scotsman” is used to exclude individuals who do not fit the speaker’s stereotype.

It works by shifting the criteria or definition of something to exclude counterexamples, thereby protecting the original generalization. The argument is made immune to disproof by redefining terms arbitrarily.

Yes. It shares some similarities with the begging the question autumnacy (circular reasoning autumnacy), ad hoc reasoning, and the hasty generalization autumnacy.

In its basic form, this autumnacy can occur in various fields, including politics, sports, religion, and many more. An example will be presented below.

Example: Sports

A: Elite athletes follow strict diet restrictions.

B: But my friend Ali is an elite athlete, and he admitted to eating fast food regularly.

A: Well, no true elite athlete would eat fast food regularly.


From

Viktoria Kwiatkowski

How do you like this article?

0 Reviews
 
About the author

Viktoria is currently on her path towards a bachelor’s degree in Intercultural Management. Her academic journey is complemented by her role at BachelorPrint, where she excels as a writer committed to simplifying complex topics for students. What sets Viktoria apart is her linguistic versatility, effortlessly transitioning between English and German. Through her bilingual expertise, she opens doors to knowledge for students, transcending language barriers.

Show all articles from this author
About
BachelorPrint | The #1 Online Printing Service
For Canadian Students

As a leading expert in the printing and binding of academic papers, theses, and dissertations, the BachelorPrint online printing service furnishes a diverse range of bindings and configuration options. BachelorPrint’s goal is to elicit a proud smile on every single Canadian student’s face, as they hold their ideal binding in their hands.<br/>Moreover, BachelorPrint provides numerous educational articles on insightful subjects related to academic writing in their Study Guide, assisting students during the process of writing their thesis or dissertation.


New articles