Critical thinking is a concept used in philosophy and academic writing to designate a critical attitude towards any assertion or information and the intellectual capacity that allows reasoning correctly, drawing conclusions that are not premature but considered, and supported by arguments. In addition, it provides intellectual autonomy and an ability to make decisions not tainted by cognitive biases. This article discusses the importance of critical thinking and its role when working with sources.
Definition: Critical thinking
Critical thinking can be defined as the ability to think clearly and rationally, and to understand the logical connections between ideas. It is the ability to enter into an independent and reflective thought process. Thinking critically requires the use of reasoning skills. It is about active learning and not just being a passive container for the information received. People who use critical thinking question the ideas they receive instead of accepting them at face value. Critical thinkers are also determined to test their ideas, whether they are accepted by the majority or not.
The importance of critical thinking
This skill can be helpful for writing academic essays, debating other people on political issues, or arguing whether red or white wine is better. It allows students to present a balanced view that considers all angles and means giving an opinion based on the evidence rather than bias.
Critical thinking is a skill that every human being must develop because it has qualities that help us solve problems better, become more analytical, understand how to classify information into viable and non-viable, become more curious, and question the world around us. A critical thinker can:
- identify strengths, weaknesses, and biases in information and can assess their relevance.
- challenge the status quo and analyse the facts to better understand data production contexts.
- reflect and construct a structured argument summarizing the reasoning process.
Examples of critical thinking
Here a few examples of critical reasoning:
Academic examples
The table below illustrates good and poor critical reasoning examples with respective explanations in an academic context:
Non-academic examples
A play by the American writer and playwright Reginald Rose, entitled “Twelve Angry Men”, serves as an example to illustrate the manifestations of critical thinking and counterexamples of it in a non-academic context:
Critical thinking: How it’s done
In order to develop critical thinking, students should be helped to:
- Think about any task, problem, or question openly
- Carefully consider the various options presented
- Reach reasonable conclusions based on a thoughtful evaluation of the relevant criteria
7 Tips on how to improve critical thinking
- Become more self-aware
- Understand your mental process
- Develop foresight
- Practice active listening
- Ask questions
- Evaluate existing evidence
- Read widely
numerous advantages for Canadian students:
- ✓ 3D live preview of your configuration
- ✓ Free express delivery for every order
- ✓ High-quality bindings with individual embossing
FAQs
Critical reasoning means gathering relevant information, considering solutions and conclusions, and remaining open-minded enough to consider alternative opinions or belief systems.
Critical reasoning helps deal with conspiracy theories, which can easily seduce and trap many people.
It is therefore essential to dispel extremism.
Of course! In order to develop critical reasoning, students should be helped to:
- Think about any task, problem, or question openly
- Carefully consider the various options presented
- Reach reasonable conclusions based on a thoughtful evaluation of the criteria