In research, there are many different things that can influence study outcomes. Especially, the different types of research bias can affect any study drastically, leading to invalid results. One of these biases is called demand characteristics, where the researcher’s expectations influence the answers of the participants. The following article will explain everything you need to know about demand characteristics and how to deal with them.
Definition: Demand characteristics
Demand characteristics influence the participants, when they know or guess the intent of questions in the study. They are then more likely to give answers that will meet the expectations of the researcher. This is why the actual theme of the study is mostly kept secret, or a fake topic is told to the participants.
numerous advantages for Canadian students:
- ✓ 3D live preview of your configuration
- ✓ Free express delivery for every order
- ✓ High-quality bindings with individual embossing
Impact on participants
People taking part in your research may be able to determine its purpose from its presentation or location, which may impact their actions. This shift occurs because it is difficult to pretend to be ignorant once you have an idea of the experiment’s goal. There are four possible roles that study subjects might take in a given situation under the impact of demand characteristics.
The examples to illustrate the four types are based on a fictional study about how or if listening to music reduces stress.
The subject is eager to assist, so they offer to back up the scientist’s concerns.
The subject actively works to disprove the idea being tested.
The participant crafts the most popular responses possible to avoid negative feedback.
The participant does the task as though they were unaware of the study’s assumptions.
Sources
There are a few different types of demand characteristics, that may give away the research hypothesis and thus influence the responses of the participants.
- Study rumors, inside and outside the study, might be one cause for demand characteristics. As participants may talk to one another before or after the trials, they naturally wonder what the objective is and thus create rumors about it. Some of these can actually be true and if the participants are wary of all possible options, they pay more attention to details.
- The experimental setting of the study can also hint about the objective and thus place demands on your participants, influencing their answers.
- The order of your procedure can also influence the participants, especially if the first few questions hint at your objective. People tend to form their impression of something rather quickly. If the start of your survey is about a certain topic, they will most likely believe that this is what the research is about and thus be influenced by demand characteristics.
- The communication with your participants, whether it is conscious or subconscious, also highly influences their behavior and answers. Factors can be the phrasing of your question, your tone of voice, and even your facial expressions.
- The title and tools used for the study might also give away your hypothesis or objective, and should thus be chosen very carefully to not imply demand characteristics on your participants.
Consequences
Demand characteristics have different consequences on both internal and external validity of the study.
- Internal validity is endangered if you are not able to tell whether your dependent variable changed because of the alternation in your independent variable or because of demand characteristics.
- External validity gets reduced equally because if your results are not credible and generalized, the study may not represent the population anymore.
Controlling Demand Characteristics
Some careful planning and use of research tools will allow you to reduce the possibility of demand characteristics. Using these techniques, you may lessen the likelihood of demand characteristics influencing your study.
Deception
One possible way to control demand characteristics is deception, meaning you tell the participants a different objective than your actual one to avoid them searching for the actual hypothesis. It is ethically permissible to utilize deception in research if it is justified and will not cause any damage to the participants. When subjects finish the research, it is important to have a discussion with them to explain the study’s true objectives.
Between-Groups Designs
When testing treatments, study participants are often divided in an experimental group and a control group. Experiments with a within-group design have both treatment options in one group, meaning that the participants of experimental and control group know each other. This can lead to them comparing their treatments and finding out about the objective this way. To avoid demand characteristics, use a between-group design, where the experimental and control group are independent and separated.
Double-blind Design
A double-blinded study conceals who is in the experimental and control group from both the participants and the researcher. This way, the researcher cannot give away hints accidentally, keeping the study valid, and thus also reduces demand characteristics.
Implicit Measurements
Implicit or hidden measurements in psychology reflect cognitive skills, characteristics, and behavior of participants that they may not be able to describe or recognize. When participants are unaware of the task, it can potentially conceal your study’s purpose.
FAQs
Demand characteristics may reveal the goal of a study to participants. These signals might cause them to act differently dependent on their perception of the study.
Demand characteristics can change the behavior of study participants, causing them to respond in a non-natural way that warps the results of the research.
The probability of demand characteristics influencing your study can be reduced by deceiving the participants about the objective, using implicit measurements, making a double-blind study or using between-group design.
There are many reasons why demand characteristics can happen in a study. For example, rumors about the study’s goal can emerge from speculations, the order of procedure and setting can also give hints about your objective and even non-verbal communication is able to lead them onto your hypothesis.